>>4310691
You are wrong.
Focal length affects DOF, not just subject distance/framing.

This is how smaller form factor cameras at "equivalent" focal distances achieve greater depth of field. Also, why a smartphone at ~28mm has insane depth of field at low apertures like f1.2-f1.7-f2, they're short focal lengths (like literally 4mm lenses) with big crops and they get big DOF from the short optics.

You can't work around this.
It's inherent to the optics.
Sensor size affects nothing more than FOV within your perspective with a given lens.

>>4310789
No, you're wrong. Your examples have a larger depth of field because they have smaller sensors. They are the equivalent of taking a step back and cropping the image, like I said.

>>4310662
stand further away and crop your image

>>4310789
anon is right, use any DOF calculator and you can easily prove it

>>4308015
Does anyone have lens recommendations for photographing architecture stuff? I just use a standard 50mm lens for most things but I’m curious if a wide angle lens would be better? Specifically a k-mount lens btw. Sorry for the genuinely stupid question I’m new to this stuff.

Best way to hold your camera / brace yourself for shooting without a tripod to reduce hand shake?

>>4310621
BASED. Is it worth slapping a dslr on the back of a view camera? The mounting backs are kinda pricey.

File: 72067731605__07DF1AE5-730(...).jpg (1.64 MB, 2462x3668)

1.64 MB JPG

>>4310643
I am running canon mirrorless bodies on the back with mamiya medium format lenses….. Although I really want to grab a Fuji film GFX, but that multiplies the cost a lot…..using the setup for stop motion and Timelapse in my studio. Yeah the Cambo stuff is $$$.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 11 Pro Max
Camera Software	16.6.1
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	26 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:11:02 23:08:36
Exposure Time	1/58 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	1.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.25 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	2462
Image Height	3668
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4306402

https://www.bhphotovideo.com/explora/photography/tips-and-solutions/using-a-large-format-camera-to-make-digital-photographs

Searching for these 3D printed files. I imagine they are the authors home brew. Would be cool to adapt my next technical camera.

>>4310951
here is the one from the BH blog post.

https://standardcameras.com/products/the-standard-4x5-2-0

here's some others:
https://www.printables.com/search/models?q=4x5%20camera

https://thangs.com/search/4x5%20camera?scope=all&view=grid

>>4310622
Yeah I know it’s bad. I’m just fucking around with foreground/background blur from extreme distance differences and its impact on the outcome of the photo.

Neither one of these are going to be printed or published. It’s just to start a discussion of what the role of a foreground should be. A frame for the background? What if it’s the subject instead? Or is anale Adams the best answer of “fuck it everything is in focus”
Which aesthetic choice do you like better? Which do you use? Can you provide examples with pictures you’ve taken?

>>4308063
kek, I used to work in there

File: DSC00716_Original-compressed.jpg (2.21 MB, 4000x6000)

2.21 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-6400
Camera Software	ILCE-6400 v2.00
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	135 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:02 23:02:28
Exposure Time	1/320 sec
F-Number	f/9.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	320
Brightness	10.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	90.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4000
Image Height	6000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: 2BFB7FEE-4560-49C7-8F85-D(...).jpg (3.14 MB, 6000x4000)

3.14 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	PSExpress-iOS (iOS)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:06 13:30:27
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000

>>4277028
you can't even tell

File: casio-ex-g1-05.jpg (297 KB, 1654x1309)

297 KB JPG

>>4284709
>EX-G1
I wish things still looked like this

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Phase One
Camera Model	P 25
Camera Software	ACD Systems Digital Imaging
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1016 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1016 dpi
Image Created	2009:11:18 20:32:47
ISO Speed Rating	0
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1654
Image Height	1309

>>4310778
don't see the problem desu
at least you know they won't scam you if you drive there

>>4309573
like this one

>>4310861
a 6 hour drive to save a few hundred bucks where I'll have to fill my tank twice in the current economy is the issue

There is someone local trying to sell one for nearly MSRP, maybe I can talk them down.

File: Screenshot 2024-05-06 at (...).png (967 KB, 750x959)

967 KB PNG

Is it worth the hype?

>>4310962
If it acts like a vintage lens stick with a vintage lens, but if the Image Stabilization and Auto Focus is good to help you make a crystal clear sharp image stick with that.

>>4295028
This unironically the best photo I have ever seen. I genuinely wish I could take something so fucking soulful.

>>4310686
Thank you man

File: _MG_0821_05.jpg (2.86 MB, 4141x2844)

2.86 MB JPG

Am I insane to think this looks good ?

>>4310954
Not entirely

>>4310954
it looks clean, empty and dreamy. I like it.

>>4304711
gimp?
>open image
>click save as

>>4306409
You know nothing.
When a JPEG image is corrupt, no application will open it. You need special software to repair the file as it is a heavily compressed format reliant on decompression to deliver the pixels. If something in the chain breaks, the file is "bricked" from normal programs point of view, but recovery software can detect where errors rise and you can replace bad data to fix the problems.
A few bad bits can brick a JPEG. Fixing those bits will fix the file, you might lose some 8x8 blocks but the rest can be fine. GIMP won't help with this. GIMP is what you'd use after repair to then edit out the missing blocks to fill in the missing pixels.

>>4310786
so far he knows more than you since he's actually recommended software that is free of charge and by your own admission is able to fix busted jpegs

>>4304301
Try photorec. It might not be able to fix it but it will definitely be able to find a copy of the file within the disk that was temporarily created while moving or editing or viewing since all the software creates temp versions of files while accessing it. Chances are that at least one of the recovered copies might not be damaged

>>4310787
I know English is not your first language, but consider using a translator.
GIMP does not fix busted JPEGs
GIMPO NO EL FIXO LA JPEGGOS PUTA MADRE

GIMP won't even open a busted JPEG. It just gives you an error.

File: R0000365 (2).jpg (1.36 MB, 1333x2000)

1.36 MB JPG

>>4310882
Yeah, sure. It's good enough for the most part. The only bad thing I can think of is the AF isn't really doing anything in low light and manual focus is a pia. Pic related had to have a phone light light up the fence so I could get focus.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	RICOH GR III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Macintosh)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:06 18:41:10
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	65535
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.30 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Soft
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Macro

File: R0000304.jpg (2.07 MB, 3000x2000)

2.07 MB JPG

>>4310885
oh yeah, and the grain with the bw is pretty shit. I enjoy it tremendously still.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	RICOH GR III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom Classic 13.1 (Macintosh)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:06 18:47:47
Exposure Time	1/30 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	4000
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	18.30 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Soft
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

>>4310878
I'll try to post a more "pristine" pic when I get home (these ones I had saved in cloud but for some reason they were at 4x the resolution so I had to re-downsize them) just to give you the right idea but yeah, if you want to make a print larger than A4 and still see small details up close 16Mpx won't be enough. I never had a camera with more Mpx than than that but I'm considering getting an A7R III and I think that having three times the resolution will be glorious, especially for cropping

File: R0008040.jpg (4.59 MB, 4928x3264)

4.59 MB JPG

>>4310878
>>4310895
here's a jpeg straight from the camera that I just compressed slightly with Affinity Photo

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	GR II
Camera Software	GR Firmware Ver 03.00
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2024:05:06 20:12:49
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	140
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Brightness	8.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	1830.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4928
Image Height	3264
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>4310941
Yeah, thanks for the GAS cure. There's just something iphoney about that foliage.

>>4310960
8 pages and 41 images left to go in "previous" thread you spastic adhd dipshit

>>4310937
I know it's surprising but all my images were taken in my neighborhood. I live in a waterfront area in rural Alabama.

>>4310944
So you could have been photographing sick kudzuscapes this whole time, and didn't? What the fuck man

>>4310934
ok ill bite. do you think this is a good photo? Can you explain why it is or isn't good?

>>4310955
It shows the subject it being a squirrel eating an acorn in its natural habitat.

File: GIMP Canvas filter.png (898 KB, 1392x840)

898 KB PNG

>>4310001
That appears to be GIMP's canvas texture applied to his noisy shit JPEG.

File: DSC_9283 (1).jpg (3.25 MB, 3200x2130)

3.25 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D700
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	400 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:05:05 16:02:56
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	3200
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cloudy Weather
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	400.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: DSC_9247.jpg (2.94 MB, 3245x2160)

2.94 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D700
Camera Software	Adobe Lightroom 9.2.2 (Android)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	250 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2024:05:05 16:01:26
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	3200
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	-1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Cloudy Weather
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	250.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: chick.jpg (3.47 MB, 3000x2000)

3.47 MB JPG

not a wild birb, baby rooster

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand

File: henne2.jpg (1.51 MB, 3000x3772)

1.51 MB JPG

>>4309973
what race are they?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>4310504
I am a colorist and all of the people talk about how amazing arri’s color science is and they sell lut packs to turn footage from potatoes into something that looked like it was shot on an arri. So, I just wanted an arri with arriraw so I could see what all of the hype is about and I can now tell my clients I graded footage shot on arri. They don’t need to know that of the arriraw footage I graded is videos of my cats playing. Hopefully an ad agency will be dumb enough to hire me—hopefully they’ll think I’m a pro because I graded arri and arriraw footage.

>>4310107
She gets angry because nobody will take her to the hospital, but when anybody offers to take her to the hospital, she gets angry at them and says she doesn’t want to go to the hospital. I can’t figure out woman. I am using these videos as a journal to help her vent, and I’m also testing you my cinema cameras and cinema lens so it is basically win win.

File: ocdp4g6t3s8b1.jpg (128 KB, 1080x1271)

128 KB JPG

Apologies if I don't use the right terminology here. I need an overhead light. I need a boom of some kind that can hold a 9 pound light plus whatever diffusers I toss on it. I'll need counterweights too, right?

>>4310930
I forgot what type of effect your achieving is called. It's an on going to infinity effect. Pretty interesting to look at.

>>4310945
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Droste_effect
also deeply related
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Video_feedback

>>4301387
I forgot about this

Let's Beatles

File: Agoogaga.jpg (1.66 MB, 2194x2560)

1.66 MB JPG

>>4310887
Repostin
Double exposure
Mamiya rb67pro
Ilford

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 6D
Camera Software	Capture One Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/4 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Subject Distance	0.00 m
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Image Width	2194
Image Height	2560
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>4298746
I don't think I can do all of these but I'll take a roll.

Rollim

File: NVbbeqN.jpg (1.62 MB, 3424x4656)

1.62 MB JPG

>>4298746
I'm an okay photographer may be the worst one here but the worst one period nope.

>>4310927
Yeah

Look at the bikes and the leaves. Look at the bricks. See how shaky everything is? Like the world was vibrating when you took this photo and random little things look like they've been melted and smeared? That's "computational photography" trying to guess what the noisy pixels actually were and fucking up the real shape of objects.

At least it doesn't have iphone level sharpening so it beats or equals most old point and shoots.

Also every phone has a nasty distorted wide angle lens

File: 20230601_164027.jpg (2.26 MB, 4000x2252)

2.26 MB JPG

>>4310933
Danke. I think I'm beginning to see

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-S901B
Camera Software	S901BXXU2BVL1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	69 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4000
Image Height	2252
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:06:01 16:40:27
Exposure Time	1/1416 sec
F-Number	f/2.4
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Brightness	9.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	7.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4000
Image Height	2252
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Digital Zoom Ratio	3
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	D11XLOD00AM

File: 20230529_152257.jpg (2.5 MB, 4000x2252)

2.5 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-S901B
Camera Software	S901BXXU2BVL1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	23 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4000
Image Height	2252
Image Orientation	Right-Hand, Top
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:05:29 15:22:57
Exposure Time	1/443 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	7.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	5.40 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4000
Image Height	2252
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Digital Zoom Ratio	2
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	D50XLOD01SM

File: 20230430_160950.jpg (2.73 MB, 4000x2252)

2.73 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-S901B
Camera Software	S901BXXU2BVKB
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	13 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4000
Image Height	2252
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2023:04:30 16:09:50
Exposure Time	1/2552 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	9.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	2.20 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4000
Image Height	2252
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Digital Zoom Ratio	1.2
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	D12XLOD00CM

File: 20240506_201045.jpg (2 MB, 4000x2252)

2 MB JPG

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SM-S901B
Camera Software	S901BXXU2BVKB
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	23 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Compression Scheme	JPEG Compression (Thumbnail)
Image Height	2252
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2023:04:09 12:24:32
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	4000
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Color Space Information	sRGB
Unique Image ID	D50XLOD01SM
Image Height	2252
Brightness	4.9 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Mode	Auto
Exposure Time	11/2000 sec
Flash	No Flash
F-Number	f/1.8
ISO Speed Rating	64
Image Width	4000
Focal Length	5.40 mm
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Light Source	Unknown

>>4310873
actually this is basically anyone who wants to use FF for video

>>4310873
>lifeless, neutral colors always NEED "grading"
so... a raw file?

>>4310906
No? Raw files do not contain colors. The input profile for the raw does. Raw files do produce different data from the same colors compared to raw files from different cameras, but there's no actual color in them. They're monochrome grids. A program running an algorithm uses an input profile to guestimate color from the monochrome grid.
Most editors have a totally flat profile to start from plus a editor specific interpretation and a few camera matching profiles that replicate SOOC jpegs. Capture one, for example, is known for their very good input profiles that are like camera matching+.

Maybe you meant "so... a log gamma?". Maybe, but panusonic color science in sooc video is dull enough that you might as well shoot in log.

>>4310913
this guy is retarded

>>4309250
>Full frame
>Video
Why do people keep doing this to themselves